We all know that the Academy Awards are more political than a presidential race, but we keep watching every year, and that's why when we fill out ballots (that is if we're really into it) we have a separate ballot for whom we secretly hope will win that we know will not because they're not in good standing with the committee, because the competition is too fierce, or they dropped too many F-bombs. Whatever the case may be, perhaps George C. Scott got it right when he straight up refused to show up to pick up his golden idol for his bravura performance in Patton and when it was mailed to him he mailed it back. 'It ain't nothing but a meat parade' he said. And it's sad but true that for the most part, actors especially are not given awards based on the actual merit of their performance, but for circumstance. Here's a list of some of the most grievous sins of omission in Oscar history. There are way too many for me to cover the entire spectrum so let's just focus on the acting categories...for now. By the way, this is just the tip of the iceberg, there are countless others, these are just the first ones that come to mind. In no particular order...
Anna
Magnani got her start as an icon of Italian Neo-Realism, and made her transition
into American films with the help of her #1 fan; Tennessee Williams who adapted
his play The Rose Tattoo to film
specifically for her. And to impress Tennessee Williams is no small
accomplishment. But going back to Italian neo-realism, one has to really be
something beyond method and dig into the depths of their soul so roughly that
there’s nothing to do but suffer and cry through your performance so that your
audience can fully understand your struggle.
Gena
Rowlands could be the greatest actress of all time second only to Meryl Streep.
I would go as far as to say she’s perhaps even better, and with her director
being her genius husband John Cassavetes, he worked her like a horse in a mine
so that she could turn out the most heartbreaking and nuanced performances that
touch on the female condition without beating you over the head with her
plight. She embodied every part she played, and some were so down right
complicated and layered that a ‘regular’ actress would be doomed to mess up.
She is so intelligent as an actress that she knows exactly how to peel open all
of those complex layers and get to the heart of her character.
Leonardo
DiCaprio was first nominated at 19 for his role in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape, since then he’s turned in some
amazing performances, and some not so much performances; (We all remember The
Beach) Oh you don’t? It’s because no one saw it, but as good as Matthew McConaughey’s
performance was in Dallas Buyer’s Club,
I think we can all agree that DiCaprio’s ballsy, spared no expense take on
Jordan Belfort in The Wolf of Wall Street
should have given him unquestionable rights to that golden statue.
Joaquin
Phoenix seems to be the one that’s always robbed because of politics. The
Academy just doesn’t like him no matter how brilliant he can be on screen, and
I’m not just talking about his Johnny Cash. Working with Gus Van Sant
throughout his youth definitely gave him the right training, and even in his
teens, his performances were intelligent, thought provoking, and full of
swagger. This culminated with his masterful performance in (excuse the pun) The Master, but he was upstaged by
Philip Seymour Hoffman in the same film. Even though no one won for that film
that year. Another oversight.
Judy
Garland won some kind of fake Oscar for ‘Most Promising Juvenile Performer’ or
something like that which has since been omitted (thank god), but seriously?
Judy? No Oscar? I object! Not only is she a screen legend, and an icon not only
of cinema but of culture itself, it seems almost criminal that this
unbelievably talented shooting star never got her golden statue.
Naomi
Watts is an actress that has time, but in my opinion has already proved herself
worthy of a golden statue. She was introduced to us with one hell of a bang in Mulholland Drive, and has been going
strong ever since. The problem with her is that her performances, no matter how
en pointe, are just not Oscar fodder. Her two nominations for The Impossible and 21 Grams are great examples of what this woman is capable of. She’s
very much on her way, and she’s on the Meryl Streep track. I expect great
things of her in the future, and hopefully the Academy will eventually
recognize that too.
Jake
Gyllenhaal is very young and also has plenty of time, but to only have one
nomination for Brokeback Mountain,
and getting completely overlooked for his incomparable performance in Nightcrawler is just plain wrong. I’m
sure he’ll garner a few in his career to come, but it still seems like a huge
oversight. As brilliant as Heath Ledger was in the former mentioned film, I
would argue that Gyllenhaal’s bare soul performance was perhaps even better. He
shines in everything he undertakes. Hopefully this will get noticed very soon.
Cary
Grant was another that has that ‘thank you for your body of work’ Oscars, which
is basically let’s give them one before they kick the bucket kind of awards.
You’re probably thinking this is a mistake but look it up, even the iconic Cary
Grant who was Hitchcock’s favorite collaborator has 0 under his belt. One of
his wives once said she thought that he played the same role in every movie,
and who cares? He played facets of Cary Grant; that deserves an Oscar in my
opinion.
Montgomery
Clift was perhaps the greatest actor of all time never to receive an Oscar, and
he made no point in hiding how much he wanted one. He was ‘a serious actor’ if
ever there was a more perfect example, and from his first film to his last, he
turned out absolutely flawless performances. He was trained by the Lunts as a
child on Broadway, then studied the method with Strassberg before employing his
own personal acting coach, just like Marilyn Monroe had. But his self-destructive
behavior sadly overshadowed his intense raw talent. All you have to do is watch
his 6-minute role in Judgment at
Nuremberg (his last film) to see the absolute raw talent of this man.
Marilyn
Monroe has 1 Golden Globe for Best Comedic Performance by a Woman in Some Like It Hot and that’s it. You
might want to disagree with me here because she’s known for playing dumb
blondes, but that’s only half of it. Marilyn, wanting desperately to be taken
seriously as an actress, and already being established, did something totally
unexpected and moved to New York to start over, mastering her craft under the
watchful guidance of Lee Strassberg who later became her mentor. Watch her
performances in Bus Stop and The Misfits; those are performances.
They aren’t just Monroe on screen.
No comments:
Post a Comment